[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALLhW=4SnyXRwHWToAy6Lxyxr5P7GAMUZ5e=zGhr30cE_sEU6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:14:11 -0500
From: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@...aro.org>
To: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: revise deassert sequence
Hi Benoit,
On 6 September 2012 10:12, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com> wrote:
> The sequence is good, I'm just a little bit concern about the
> duplication of code compared to _enable sequence.
>
> That being said, this is the consequence of removing the hardreset
> sequence outside of the main _enable/_shutdown sequence.
>
> So I'm not sure I have any better way of doing that :-(
Indeed, it should be exactly the same as putting back the reset
sequence into _enable/_shutdown, so with these patches I was expecting
we could gather the hard reset users and see if they needed anything
else beyond these functions, if not, perhaps just put back the reset
code into _enable/_shutdown paths.
Thanks,
Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists