linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: Add pinctrl-single,bits type of mux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:49:55 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: Add pinctrl-single,bits
 type of mux

* Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> [120910 00:11]:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com> wrote:
> 
> > With pinctrl-single,bits it is possible to update just part of the register
> > within the pinctrl-single,function-mask area.
> > This is useful when one register configures mmore than one pin's mux.
> >
> > pinctrl-single,bits takes three parameters:
> > <reg offset, value, sub-mask>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> 
> Do we have a conclusion on this patch 2/2?
> 
> I'm holding it back until Tony explicitly ACKs it for now.

I don't like the idea of mixing different types of controllers
here, so let's wait a little bit on 2/2.

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/