[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <504E4E34.1040603@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:31:48 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Improving directed yield scalability for PLE handler
On 09/10/2012 04:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:12 -0500, Andrew Theurer wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * if the target task is not running, then only yield if the
>> + * current task is in guest mode
>> + */
>> + if (!(p_rq->curr->flags & PF_VCPU))
>> + goto out_irq;
>
> This would make yield_to() only ever work on KVM, not that I mind this
> too much, its a horrid thing and making it less useful for (ab)use is a
> good thing, still this probably wants mention somewhere :-)
Also, it would not preempt a non-kvm task, even if we need
to do that to boost a VCPU. I think the lines above should
be dropped.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists