| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120910223355.GD7677@google.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:33:55 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with
broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them
(forgot cc'ing containers / cgroups mailing lists and used the old
address for Li. Reposting. Sorry for the noise.)
Currently, cgroup hierarchy support is a mess. cpu related subsystems
behave correctly - configuration, accounting and control on a parent
properly cover its children. blkio and freezer completely ignore
hierarchy and treat all cgroups as if they're directly under the root
cgroup. Others show yet different behaviors.
These differing interpretations of cgroup hierarchy make using cgroup
confusing and it impossible to co-mount controllers into the same
hierarchy and obtain sane behavior.
Eventually, we want full hierarchy support from all subsystems and
probably a unified hierarchy. Users using separate hierarchies
expecting completely different behaviors depending on the mounted
subsystem is deterimental to making any progress on this front.
This patch adds cgroup_subsys.broken_hierarchy and sets it to %true
for controllers which are lacking in hierarchy support. The goal of
this patch is two-fold.
* Move users away from using hierarchy on currently non-hierarchical
subsystems, so that implementing proper hierarchy support on those
doesn't surprise them.
* Keep track of which controllers are broken how and nudge the
subsystems to implement proper hierarchy support.
For now, start with a single warning message. We can whine louder
later on.
(I tried to document what's broken and how it should be fixed. If I
got something wrong, please let me know.)
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
block/blk-cgroup.c | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/cgroup.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
kernel/cgroup.c | 11 ++++++++++-
kernel/cgroup_freezer.c | 8 ++++++++
kernel/events/core.c | 7 +++++++
mm/memcontrol.c | 12 +++++++++---
net/core/netprio_cgroup.c | 12 +++++++++++-
net/sched/cls_cgroup.c | 9 +++++++++
security/device_cgroup.c | 9 +++++++++
9 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -737,6 +737,14 @@ struct cgroup_subsys blkio_subsys = {
.subsys_id = blkio_subsys_id,
.base_cftypes = blkcg_files,
.module = THIS_MODULE,
+
+ /*
+ * blkio subsystem is utterly broken in terms of hierarchy support.
+ * It treats all cgroups equally regardless of where they're
+ * located in the hierarchy - all cgroups are treated as if they're
+ * right below the root. Fix it and remove the following.
+ */
+ .broken_hierarchy = true,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkio_subsys);
--- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
@@ -503,6 +503,21 @@ struct cgroup_subsys {
*/
bool __DEPRECATED_clear_css_refs;
+ /*
+ * If %false, this subsystem is properly hierarchical -
+ * configuration, resource accounting and restriction on a parent
+ * cgroup cover those of its children. If %true, hierarchy support
+ * is broken in some ways - some subsystems ignore hierarchy
+ * completely while others are only implemented half-way.
+ *
+ * It's now diallowed to create nested cgroups if the subsystem is
+ * broken and cgroup core will emit a warning message on such
+ * cases. Eventually, all subsystems will be made properly
+ * hierarchical and this will go away.
+ */
+ bool broken_hierarchy;
+ bool warned_broken_hierarchy;
+
#define MAX_CGROUP_TYPE_NAMELEN 32
const char *name;
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -4075,8 +4075,17 @@ static long cgroup_create(struct cgroup
set_bit(CGRP_CLONE_CHILDREN, &cgrp->flags);
for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
- struct cgroup_subsys_state *css = ss->create(cgrp);
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
+
+ if (ss->broken_hierarchy && !ss->warned_broken_hierarchy &&
+ parent->parent) {
+ pr_warning("cgroup: \"%s\" is not properly hierarchical yet, do not nest cgroups.\n",
+ ss->name);
+ pr_warning("cgroup: \"memory\" requires setting use_hierarchy to 1 on the root.\n");
+ ss->warned_broken_hierarchy = true;
+ }
+ css = ss->create(cgrp);
if (IS_ERR(css)) {
err = PTR_ERR(css);
goto err_destroy;
--- a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
@@ -373,4 +373,12 @@ struct cgroup_subsys freezer_subsys = {
.can_attach = freezer_can_attach,
.fork = freezer_fork,
.base_cftypes = files,
+
+ /*
+ * freezer subsys doesn't handle hierarchy at all. Frozen state
+ * should be inherited through the hierarchy - if a parent is
+ * frozen, all its children should be frozen. Fix it and remove
+ * the following.
+ */
+ .broken_hierarchy = true,
};
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7285,5 +7285,12 @@ struct cgroup_subsys perf_subsys = {
.destroy = perf_cgroup_destroy,
.exit = perf_cgroup_exit,
.attach = perf_cgroup_attach,
+
+ /*
+ * perf_event cgroup doesn't handle nesting correctly.
+ * ctx->nr_cgroups adjustments should be propagated through the
+ * cgroup hierarchy. Fix it and remove the following.
+ */
+ .broken_hierarchy = true,
};
#endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_PERF */
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3855,12 +3855,17 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchy_write(st
*/
if ((!parent_memcg || !parent_memcg->use_hierarchy) &&
(val == 1 || val == 0)) {
- if (list_empty(&cont->children))
+ if (list_empty(&cont->children)) {
memcg->use_hierarchy = val;
- else
+ /* we're fully hierarchical iff root uses hierarchy */
+ if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
+ mem_cgroup_subsys.broken_hierarchy = !val;
+ } else {
retval = -EBUSY;
- } else
+ }
+ } else {
retval = -EINVAL;
+ }
out:
cgroup_unlock();
@@ -4953,6 +4958,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup *cont)
&per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
INIT_WORK(&stock->work, drain_local_stock);
}
+ mem_cgroup_subsys.broken_hierarchy = !memcg->use_hierarchy;
hotcpu_notifier(memcg_cpu_hotplug_callback, 0);
} else {
parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont->parent);
--- a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
+++ b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
@@ -330,7 +330,17 @@ struct cgroup_subsys net_prio_subsys = {
.subsys_id = net_prio_subsys_id,
#endif
.base_cftypes = ss_files,
- .module = THIS_MODULE
+ .module = THIS_MODULE,
+
+ /*
+ * net_prio has artificial limit on the number of cgroups and
+ * disallows nesting making it impossible to co-mount it with other
+ * hierarchical subsystems. Remove the artificially low PRIOIDX_SZ
+ * limit and properly nest configuration such that children follow
+ * their parents' configurations by default and are allowed to
+ * override and remove the following.
+ */
+ .broken_hierarchy = trye,
};
static int netprio_device_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
--- a/net/sched/cls_cgroup.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_cgroup.c
@@ -82,6 +82,15 @@ struct cgroup_subsys net_cls_subsys = {
#endif
.base_cftypes = ss_files,
.module = THIS_MODULE,
+
+ /*
+ * While net_cls cgroup has the rudimentary hierarchy support of
+ * inheriting the parent's classid on cgroup creation, it doesn't
+ * properly propagates config changes in ancestors to their
+ * descendents. A child should follow the parent's configuration
+ * but be allowed to override it. Fix it and remove the following.
+ */
+ .broken_hierarchy = true,
};
struct cls_cgroup_head {
--- a/security/device_cgroup.c
+++ b/security/device_cgroup.c
@@ -457,6 +457,15 @@ struct cgroup_subsys devices_subsys = {
.destroy = devcgroup_destroy,
.subsys_id = devices_subsys_id,
.base_cftypes = dev_cgroup_files,
+
+ /*
+ * While devices cgroup has the rudimentary hierarchy support which
+ * checks the parent's restriction, it doesn't properly propagates
+ * config changes in ancestors to their descendents. A child
+ * should only be allowed to add more restrictions to the parent's
+ * configuration. Fix it and remove the following.
+ */
+ .broken_hierarchy = true,
};
int __devcgroup_inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists