[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120910225504.GA18038@localhost>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:55:04 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...il.com,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: fix on-stack pci_device_id's
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:44:32PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> wrote:
> > Commit "PCI: Use pci_device_id on stack for pci_get_subsys/class() to
> > avoid kmalloc" changed heap allocations to on-stack variables, but it
> > did not add initialization of other than set members. This causes
> > random failures during bootup wherever pci device is needed to be
> > found. Hence the boot just hangs or panics.
> >
> > This patches fixes it by setting the content of pci_device_id directly
> > in the initializer.
>
> Nice! I fixed this already by adding a memset(), but I like your way
> better. I knew we could initialize members of a structure on the
> stack, but I didn't know C guaranteed that uninitialized members would
> be implicitly initialized also. But apparently it does:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10828294/c-and-c-partial-initialization-of-automatic-structure
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
For the record, I proposed the same initializer-style fix in the very
beginning that you didn't realize its beauty until now ;-)
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists