linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: use pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <002601cd8feb$7aa51c60$6fef5520$%han@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:02:59 +0900
From:	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
To:	'Ryan Mallon' <rmallon@...il.com>, balbi@...com
Cc:	'Grant Likely' <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	'Linus Walleij' <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: use pr_* instead of printk

On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 3:48 PM Ryan Mallon wrote
> 
> On 11/09/12 16:39, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 3:31 PM Felipe Balbi wrote
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:59:11PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> >>> This patch uses pr_* instead of printk.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c |    6 +++---
> >>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> >>> index ba126cc..e38d990 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> >>> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
> >>>  #ifndef DEBUG_GPIO
> >>>  #define gpio_dbg(x...) do { } while (0)
> >>>  #else
> >>> -#define gpio_dbg(x...) printk(KERN_DEBUG x)
> >>> +#define gpio_dbg(x...) pr_debug(x)
> >>>  #endif
> >>>
> >>>  int samsung_gpio_setpull_updown(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
> >>> @@ -926,10 +926,10 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip)
> >>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> >>>  	if (chip->pm != NULL) {
> >>>  		if (!chip->pm->save || !chip->pm->resume)
> >>> -			printk(KERN_ERR "gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n",
> >>> +			pr_err("gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n",
> >>>  			       gc->label);
> >>
> >> I would rather see dev_* conversion instead.
> >>
> >> my 2 cents
> >
> > Hi Felipe Balbi,
> >
> > OK, I will replace printk(KERN_ERR...) with dev_err.
> > Thank you.
> 
> I was going to suggest that also, but I don't think that there is a dev
> pointer to use. The gpio_chip structure has an optional one, but from my
> quick glance it didn't look like the Samsung driver was using it. I
> could be wrong though. If I am, go with dev_err (and dev_dbg for
> replacing the gpio_dbg statements).

Also, I cannot find dev point to use.
I will use pr_dbg, pr_err.

Thanks.

> 
> ~Ryan
> 
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/