lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120911084755.GO19396@mwanda>
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:47:55 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez 
	<siglesias@...lia.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@...rogge.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	industrypack-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/20] Staging: ipack: Choose the optimum bus speed by
 default.

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:51:43AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> From: Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@...rogge.org>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@...rogge.org>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@...lia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/ipack/ipack.c |    5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ipack/ipack.c b/drivers/staging/ipack/ipack.c
> index 521ff55..6e0b441 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ipack/ipack.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ipack/ipack.c
> @@ -386,6 +386,11 @@ struct ipack_device *ipack_device_register(struct ipack_bus_device *bus,
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* if the device supports 32 MHz operation, use it. */
> +	ret = bus->ops->set_clockrate(dev, dev->speed_32mhz ? 32 : 8);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		dev_err(&dev->dev, "failed to switch to 32 MHz operation.\n");

It's strange that we don't test the ->speed_8mhz flag.  Do we even
need that flag?  It might be better to write it like this:

	if (dev->speed_32mhz) {
		ret = bus->ops->set_clockrate(dev, 32);
		 if (ret < 0) {
		 	dev_err(&dev->dev,
			        "failed to switch to 32 MHz operation.\n");
		}
	}

The error message is not accurate in the original code because it
says 32 even if you tried to set it to 8.

regards,
dan carpenter


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ