[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120911093826.GJ3647@sortiz-mobl>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:38:26 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
"v3.4+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mfd: max8925: Move _IO resources out of
ioport_ioresource
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 07:42:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> The removal of mach/io.h from most ARM platforms also set the range of
> valid IO ports to be empty for most platforms when previously any 32
> bit integer had been valid. This makes it impossible to add IO resources
> as the added range is smaller than that of the root resource for IO ports.
>
> Since we're not really using IO memory at all fix this by defining our
> own root resource outside the normal tree and make that the parent of
> all IO resources. This also ensures we won't conflict with read IO ports
> if we ever run on a platform which happens to use them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org (v3.4+)
> ---
> drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
Thanks a lot for the follow up. The 7 patches are applied to my for-next
branch now.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists