[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1347363313-17094-14-git-send-email-siglesias@igalia.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:35:06 +0200
From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
<siglesias@...lia.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
industrypack-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
<siglesias@...lia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/20] Staging: ipack/bridges/tpci200: fix the uninstall the ipack device
Using the call to the ipack_device_unregister() function to avoid the
strange way it was doing, as the device model will take care of calling
the bus's .remove function when a device is being unregistered.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@...lia.com>
---
drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
index b928140..77e6392 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
@@ -385,7 +385,6 @@ static int tpci200_slot_unregister(struct ipack_device *dev)
return -ERESTARTSYS;
tpci200->slots[dev->slot].dev = NULL;
- ipack_device_unregister(dev);
mutex_unlock(&tpci200->mutex);
return 0;
@@ -614,7 +613,7 @@ static void tpci200_uninstall(struct tpci200_board *tpci200)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < TPCI200_NB_SLOT; i++)
- tpci200_slot_unregister(tpci200->slots[i].dev);
+ ipack_device_unregister(tpci200->slots[i].dev);
tpci200_unregister(tpci200);
kfree(tpci200->slots);
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists