linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120911115449.GH18907@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:54:50 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti@...com>
Cc:	balbi@...com, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@...com>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, alan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 05:01:06PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
> On Sunday 09 September 2012 12:34 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> In addition, IMO, if this was only tested on Panda (as suggested by
> >> > earlier cover letters), it really should not have been merged until it
> >> > got some broader testing.
> > Shubhro's got his Tested-by tag. I believe he tested on beagleboard and
> > omap4sdp. Shubhro, can you confirm which platforms you tested the UART
> > patches ? cheers
> Felipe I had boot tested on omap3sdp and onap4 sdp and did pm testing
> on both with omap3 hitting off.

Thanks ;-)

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)