linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1347375033.27206.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:50:33 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
	linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically
 available

On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 16:44 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 02:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:20:21AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>[...]
> >> OK, that's what I'd thought was going on - it was the fact that you'd
> >> just acked the patch rather than asked for it to go to the patch tracker
> >> or something which made me wonder if things had changed.
> > 
> > I kind'a forgot because it's been soo long since I took any of those
> > patches...
> 
> Ok, what's the plan? Should I add this patch to the patch tracker?

I'd propose to send it to Linus for v3.6 even.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)