[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <504F65A7.3040203@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:24:07 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Youquan Song <youquan.song@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Linux kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@....com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ShuoX Liu <shuox.liu@...el.com>, youquan.song@...el.com
Subject: Re: KS/Plumbers: c-state governor BOF
On 09/12/2012 12:15 AM, Youquan Song wrote:
>> Your patches could make a lot of sense when integrated with my
>> patches:
>>
>> http://people.redhat.com/riel/cstate/
>> However, we should probably get the tracepoint upstream first,
>> so we can know for sure :)
>
> I can not access the patches at this directory. Can you send it to me?
> I will look at your patches and then integrated with my patches to look
> what will happen tomorrow.
Argh, fixed!
> Do you have test case share? or ideas how to show the benefit.
>
> I have done many test for my pathes. It show some benefit big or small
> in various cases, but there is no negative effect showed at least.
>
> I have two onviced test cases to show the great benefit
> 1. turbostat v1 (before 3.5)
> 2. I write the simple test application which also show greate benefit.
> running it by #./idle_predict -l 8
>
>
> I write a simple application using usleep which it is clear to the
> repeat mode prediction failure will greatly effect the application with
> such repeat pattern.
Your test looks exactly like the kind of thing that could benefit
from my changes to the menu governor :)
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists