[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120911174319.GO7677@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:43:19 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with
broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:08:37AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > So isn't cpuset broken too? child cpuset's cpu mask isn't necessary a subset
> > of the parent's if the cpu_exclusive flag is not set.
>
> Heh, didn't even look at that. Just assumed it was in the same boat
> w/ cpu{acct}. Will take a look.
Hmm... Looked at it and I don't think hierarchy support is broken w/
or w/o exclusive. Can you please elaborate?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists