[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120911221344.GF27031@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:13:44 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: "Voss, Nikolaus" <N.Voss@...nmann.de>,
"'ludovic.desroches'" <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
'Yanes Martinez Adrian' <adrian.yanes@...to.fi>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"'ben-linux@...ff.org'" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
"'balbi@...com'" <balbi@...com>,
"'h.feurstein@...il.com'" <h.feurstein@...il.com>,
"'rmallon@...il.com'" <rmallon@...il.com>,
"'carsten.behling@...z-fricke.com'" <carsten.behling@...z-fricke.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c: add new driver
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:26:39AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 08/27/2012 04:29 PM, Voss, Nikolaus :
> > ludovic.desroches wrote on Monday, August 27, 2012 4:00 PM :
> >> For the moment, I don't have the necessary knowledge about the TWI
> >> controller to take a decision. I would say it can be done in an other
> >> patch in order to have your driver included in the mainline quickly
> >> since it doesn't introduce a breakage.
> >
> > That would be the most pragmatic approach.
> > Wolfram, is the anything left to do from my side?
>
> Wolfram, ping?
>
> Can we imagine to have this support and the device tree patches from
> Ludovic in 3.7-final?
Yes. I'd need your ack since it touches mach-specific stuff. Reviewed-by
would be even better since you know the HW better than me :)
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists