[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd_Zdb_3rqwgf03To+DPw-wFXUGW-5km7KVaiJSymEuGMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:12:40 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
Vivek Trivedi <t.vivek@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] writeback: add dirty_background_time per bdi variable
>>
>> To be frank, no realistic NFS servers will use USB disk as backing
>> storage. So that rational for reducing "initial" delays is weak.
>> Continuous write performance to HDD is much more important. Do you
>> have numbers for that?
>
> Actually, we use USB HDD and USB Flash devices at NFS server.
> There can be other similar users as well. So it might be useful to
> provide this tuning feature other.
> As default value is zero, it is disabled by default and it should not
> impact normal writeback.
>
> I will share large file writes test result on NFS client on USB HDD
> with/without tuning with patch.
Hi. Wu.
I share 1GB continous write test result.
-> create a 1000 MB file
For continuous write - create 1 GB file
RecSize WriteSpeed
10485760 10.47MB/sec
1048576 10.35MB/sec
524288 10.48MB/sec
262144 10.48MB/sec
131072 10.52MB/sec
65536 10.56MB/sec
32768 10.64MB/sec
16384 10.31MB/sec
8192 10.52MB/sec
4096 10.45MB/sec
I will update changelog in patch.
Thanks Wu!.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists