[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <504E9EBE.1040403@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:15:26 +0800
From: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To: isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com
CC: wency@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
cmetcalf@...era.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, liuj97@...il.com, len.brown@...el.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, cl@...ux.com,
minchan.kim@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v9 PATCH 05/21] memory-hotplug: check whether memory is
present or not
Hi, ishimatsu
At 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, wency@...fujitsu.com Wrote:
> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>
> If system supports memory hot-remove, online_pages() may online removed pages.
> So online_pages() need to check whether onlining pages are present or not.
Because we use memory_block_change_state() to hotremoving memory, I think
this patch can be removed. What do you think?
Thanks
Wen Congyang
>
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 2daa54f..ac3ae30 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1180,6 +1180,25 @@ void sparse_init(void);
> #define sparse_index_init(_sec, _nid) do {} while (0)
> #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
> +static inline int pfns_present(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + int i;
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> + if (pfn_present(pfn + i))
> + continue;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline int pfns_present(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM*/
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES
> bool early_pfn_in_nid(unsigned long pfn, int nid);
> #else
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 49f7747..299747d 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -467,6 +467,19 @@ int __ref online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> struct memory_notify arg;
>
> lock_memory_hotplug();
> + /*
> + * If system supports memory hot-remove, the memory may have been
> + * removed. So we check whether the memory has been removed or not.
> + *
> + * Note: When CONFIG_SPARSEMEM is defined, pfns_present() become
> + * effective. If CONFIG_SPARSEMEM is not defined, pfns_present()
> + * always returns 0.
> + */
> + ret = pfns_present(pfn, nr_pages);
> + if (ret) {
> + unlock_memory_hotplug();
> + return ret;
> + }
> arg.start_pfn = pfn;
> arg.nr_pages = nr_pages;
> arg.status_change_nid = -1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists