lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:54:25 +0800
From:	Chao Xie <xiechao.mail@...il.com>
To:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc:	haojian.zhuang@...il.com, viresh.linux@...il.com,
	s.hauer@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, chao.xie@...vell.com,
	arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/5] clk: mmp: add clock framework for mmp

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org> wrote:
> Quoting Chao Xie (2012-08-26 18:19:02)
>> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > Quoting Chao Xie (2012-08-19 19:55:10)
>> >> From: Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>
>> >>  arch/arm/mach-mmp/Kconfig    |    3 +
>> >>  drivers/clk/Makefile         |    3 +
>> >>  drivers/clk/mmp/Makefile     |    9 +
>> >>  drivers/clk/mmp/clk-apbc.c   |  152 ++++++++++++++
>> >>  drivers/clk/mmp/clk-apmu.c   |   97 +++++++++
>> >>  drivers/clk/mmp/clk-frac.c   |  153 ++++++++++++++
>> >>  drivers/clk/mmp/clk-mmp2.c   |  449 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa168.c |  346 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa910.c |  320 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  drivers/clk/mmp/clk.h        |   35 ++++
>> >
>> > Looks like you are not removing your arch/arm/mach-mmp/clock.c.  Is that
>> > intentional?
>> >
>> > When I apply your series against v3.6-rc3 I find that compilation breaks
>> > with mmp2_defconfig due to conflicting definitions for the clk api
>> > (clk_enable, clk_set_rate, etc).  This is not surprising since your
>> > legacy clock code is neither deleted nor removed from compilation
>> > conditionally by checking for CONFIG_COMMON_CLK.
>> >
>> > Did I somehow manage to misapply your patches or should your patches
>> > have removed the arch-specific clock framework as well?
>> >
>> hi, Mike
>> Yes. There are some patches for seperate the original clock code in arch.
>> I had sent these patches before, but it seems that too many patches
>> sent, and haojian missed it.
>> I will sent out the patches for arch today. Thanks.
>>
>
> I pulled in the dependency series and the build goes through nicely now.
> I'm happy to take these five patches into clk-next but of course mmp
> will have problems building clk-next without the dependencies, which I
> assume are going through arm-soc.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>> > Regards,
>> > Mike
>> >
>> >>  10 files changed, 1567 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mmp/Makefile
>> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mmp/clk-apbc.c
>> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mmp/clk-apmu.c
>> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mmp/clk-frac.c
>> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mmp/clk-mmp2.c
>> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa168.c
>> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa910.c
>> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mmp/clk.h

Thanks.
I think Haojian who is the maintainer of pxa and mmp will help to
integrate the dependency patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists