[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120912072219.GA518@vandijck-laurijssen.be>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:22:19 +0200
From: Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@....be>
To: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...il.com>
CC: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] can: rename LED trigger name on netdev renames
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:13:14AM +0200, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:42:19AM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> > On 10.09.2012 22:08, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > > But the initial name must have been set properly already in that case...
> >
> > Yes it is.
> >
> > See register_netdevice()
> >
> > http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.5.3/net/core/dev.c#L5453
> >
> >
> > at the end NETDEV_REGISTER is notified:
> >
> > http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.5.3/net/core/dev.c#L5552
> >
> > So it would be pretty elegant to create the LED trigger name in the notifier.
> > This would allow to remove that code at the current init function too.
>
> That would indeed be elegant, but in the current implementation
> triggers only works for supported drivers, while putting registration in
> the notifier would imply to use it also in unsupported ones, where you
> would get a trigger which never triggers.
I note here another problem: any candev rename causes the notifier to
rename its led triggers, but some have it never registered.
Oliver, your approach is the better. It took a bit for me to see ...
but this requires a bit of reverting in the drivers.
Kind regards,
Kurt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists