[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120912.034901.184817520125489015.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 03:49:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: nhorman@...driver.com, David.Laight@...lab.com,
john.r.fastabend@...el.com, gaofeng@...fujitsu.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, mark.d.rustad@...el.com,
lizefan@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 2/2] netprio_cgroup: Use memcpy instead of the
for-loop to copy priomap
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:37:47 +0530
> + memcpy(new_priomap->priomap, old_priomap->priomap,
> + old_priomap->priomap_len *
> + sizeof(old_priomap->priomap[0]));
This argument indentation is ridiculous. Try:
memcpy(new_priomap->priomap, old_priomap->priomap,
old_priomap->priomap_len *
sizeof(old_priomap->priomap[0]));
Using TABs exclusively for argumentat indentation is not the goal.
Rather, lining the arguments up properly so that they sit at the first
column after the first line's openning parenthesis is what you should
be trying to achieve.
And ignoring whatever stylistic convention we may or may not have, I
find it impossibly hard to believe that the code quoted above looks
good even to you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists