[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120912010720.GM4257@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:07:21 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Permit RCU_NONIDLE() to be used
from interrupt context
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 07:47 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:24:41AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:09:40PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:54:04PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:54 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > > > Not sure I see much difference in aesthetics between the three approaches,
> > > > > > > but am willing to switch over to a generally agreed-upon scheme.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Steve, could I get an ack from you on the patch I sent?
> > > > >
> > > > > I acked it, but do you just want me to take the patch? I'm getting ready
> > > > > for another 3.7 push to tip.
> > > >
> > > > Up to Paul. What would make it easiest to coordinate that patch and the
> > > > corresponding bits in the RCU patch series?
> > >
> > > All I need to do is to eventually remove the exports, correct?
> > > If so, full speed ahead!
> >
> > Sounds like you could go ahead and remove the exports now, and just make
> > sure Steve's push goes in before yours.
> >
>
> Is there any rush to do this? I just plan on pushing it for 3.7.
>
> Paul, you just push your changes through tip, right? Then we can just
> let Ingo know. I could even make the patch a separate branch, that Ingo
> can pull into the RCU branch too.
Yep! But we also need to worry about -next and -fengguang.
How about if you push your change into 3.7 and I push mine into 3.8?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists