linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf: use hrtimer for event multiplexing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABPqkBRRS7uz9kt-g8Rjj8K86AE+7U-emqKv1=tqcuRyqEk=Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:48:04 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf: use hrtimer for event multiplexing

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 16:43 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> The hrtimer_active is used to prevent activating the timer multiple times
>> in a row.
>
> see hrtimer_active(), this should do what you want I think.

I need something that is true even when the hrtimer is not executing
the callback handler. I guess that may be the different between
hrtimer_active() vs. hrtimer_running()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/