linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Permit RCU_NONIDLE() to be used from interrupt context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:03:28 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Permit RCU_NONIDLE() to be used
 from interrupt context

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:13:30AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 18:07 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >  
> > > Paul, you just push your changes through tip, right? Then we can just
> > > let Ingo know. I could even make the patch a separate branch, that Ingo
> > > can pull into the RCU branch too.
> > 
> > Yep!  But we also need to worry about -next and -fengguang.
> > 
> > How about if you push your change into 3.7 and I push mine into 3.8?
> 
> Bah, this is what Linus said not to do. Although he's more about not
> having this happen in a single merge window, but this isn't the "git
> way".
> 
> There should be no problem in pushing the patch based off of Linus's
> tree and have it be pulled into two branches. This is what Linus said he
> wanted. The change will go in via one of the branches, whichever is
> pulled first. And as the change will have the same SHA1 in both
> branches, git will merge it nicely. This is what Linus said at kernel
> summit that he wants people to do.
> 
> Note, this will also get into -next and -fengguang's tree as well,
> without issue.

Doesn't Fengguang pull branches individually?  And won't that mean
that as soon as I push my export-removal commit, that he will see
build failures?

Or are you suggesting that we both send both commits?

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/