[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120912152756.GA18155@amt.cnet>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:27:56 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/12] KVM: indicate readonly access fault
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:39:01AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:18:22PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > The same can happen with slot deletion, for example.
> > >
> > > Userspace (which performed the modification which can result in faults
> > > to non-existant/read-only/.../new-tag memslot), must handle the faults
> > > properly or avoid the possibility for reference to memslot information
> > > from the past.
> > >
> > > I think its worthwhile to add a note about this in the API
> > > documentation: "The user of this interface is responsible for handling
> > > references to stale memslot information, either by handling
> > > exit notifications which reference stale memslot information or not
> > > allowing these notifications to exist by stopping all vcpus in userspace
> > > before performing modifications to the memslots map".
> >
> > Or we can drop the new interface and rely on userspace to perform the
> > lookup under its own locking rules.
> >
> > It's slow, but writes to ROM or ROM/device are rare anyway.
>
> Lookup what information?
Ping?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists