linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: host: tegra: code clean up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5050D034.7030203@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:11:00 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>
CC:	balbi@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: host: tegra: code clean up

On 09/12/2012 01:02 AM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
> As part of code clean up, used devm counterparts for the APIs
> possible.

Almost all of this patch has already been applied as:

bc2ff98 drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c: use devm_ functions

(btw, that patch has a much better patch subject than this one)

The only additions in your patch are shown below, and those changes
should indeed be a separate patch.

> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
> index 6223d17..dba9f07 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
> @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static int tegra_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                         break;
>                 default:
>                         err = -ENODEV;
> -                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unknown usb instance\n");
> +                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unknown usb inst:%d\n", instance);
>                         goto fail_io;
>                 }
>         }
> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static int tegra_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>         err = usb_add_hcd(hcd, irq, IRQF_SHARED);
>         if (err) {
> -               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add USB HCD\n");
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "usb_add_hcd failed with err 0x%x\n", err);
>                 goto fail;
>         }
>  
> @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static int tegra_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>         /* Don't skip the pm_runtime_forbid call if wakeup isn't working */
>         /* if (!pdata->power_down_on_bus_suspend) */
> -               pm_runtime_forbid(&pdev->dev);
> +       pm_runtime_forbid(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
>         return err;

I'm not sure that last change is worth making; hopefully, you'll fix the
bug the causes the "if" to be commented out, and we can re-enabled it
again. Removing the indent makes it much less obvious which lines of
code the "if" was intended to cover.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/