linux-kernel - Re: Storage related regression in linux-next 20120824

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120912043647.GA3084@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:36:47 +0800
From:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Cc:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Arvydas Sidorenko <asido4@...il.com>,
	Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Storage related regression in linux-next 20120824

On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 04:50:47PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 04:36 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com> wrote:
> >>I'll send Linus a patch to disable.
> >
> >Thanks, but no, the change in question hasn't reached Linus yet, it's
> >just a linux-next or mmotm thing - isn't it?
> 
> Yep, libata-dev#upstream.  Sorry, got my own branches confused for a
> second there.

Sorry for delay reply.  In our product system, we tested a lot of
different brands of SATA disks, and it is OK after fua is enabled on
default.  Certainly we can't test all disks. :-(

So I think we quite have to revert my patch now, and try to fix the
current problem.

Regards,
Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/