[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50516220.7060507@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:33:36 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: acme@...stprotocols.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: require exclude_guest to use PEBS - kernel
side enforcement
On 9/12/12 8:38 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:16:29 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>
>> Per Peter:
>> "Intel PEBS in VT-x context uses the DS address as a guest linear address,
>> even though its programmed by the host as a host linear address. This
>> either results in guest memory corruption and or the hardware faulting and
>> 'crashing' the virtual machine. Therefore we have to disable PEBS on VT-x
>> enter and re-enable on VT-x exit, enforcing a strict exclude_guest.
>>
>> This patch enforces exclude_guest kernel side.
>>
> [snip]
>> @@ -380,6 +383,9 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
>> if (event->attr.precise_ip) {
>> int precise = 0;
>>
>> + if (!event->attr.exclude_guest)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> I see a whitespace problem here. :)
grr.... an extra freaking tab.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists