linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] module: report -EFAULT on bytes remaining

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:01:24 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: report -EFAULT on bytes remaining

Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:06:16AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Caught by smatch:
>> kernel/module.c:2450 copy_module_from_user() warn: maybe return -EFAULT instead of the bytes remaining?  
>> 
>> Clean up the copy_from_user() call to not report a positive value.
>> With this patch, init_module() will report errors from copy_from_user
>> (before it would always only report -EFAULT when err != 0).
>> 
>> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> This change is on top of the finit_module patch series.
>> ---
>>  kernel/module.c |    5 ++++-
>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
>> index 0ad03c4..05b8dde 100644
>> --- a/kernel/module.c
>> +++ b/kernel/module.c
>> @@ -2441,8 +2441,11 @@ int copy_module_from_user(const void __user *umod, unsigned long len,
>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>  
>>  	err = copy_from_user(info->hdr, umod, info->len);
>> -	if (err)
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		if (err > 0)
>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^
> This condition is always true because copy_to/from_user() returns
> the number of bytes remaining to be copied.  (It never returns a
> negative error code).

Yes, I made the obvious fix (eliminating the >0 check).

This "copy_from_user is stupid" was a debate a lost long ago, but it
still annoys me.

Applied,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/