[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1347524318.15764.99.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:18:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
mingo@...hat.com, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: nohz_idle_balance
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 06:11 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On tickless system, one CPU runs load balance for all idle CPUs.
> The cpu_load of this CPU is updated before starting the load balance
> of each other idle CPUs. We should instead update the cpu_load of the balance_cpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 1ca4fe4..9ae3a5b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4794,14 +4794,15 @@ static void nohz_idle_balance(int this_cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
> if (need_resched())
> break;
>
> - raw_spin_lock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
> - update_rq_clock(this_rq);
> - update_idle_cpu_load(this_rq);
> - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
> + rq = cpu_rq(balance_cpu);
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
> + update_rq_clock(rq);
> + update_idle_cpu_load(rq);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
D'0h good spotting..
> rebalance_domains(balance_cpu, CPU_IDLE);
>
> - rq = cpu_rq(balance_cpu);
> if (time_after(this_rq->next_balance, rq->next_balance))
> this_rq->next_balance = rq->next_balance;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists