linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] nohz: clean up select_nohz_load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:25:25 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nohz: clean up select_nohz_load_balancer()

On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:33 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > nohz_balance_enter_idle is good a name too. but I name it as
> > set_nohz_tick_stopped, since there is a clear_nohz_tick_stopped(), that
> > just do the opposed action of this function. According to this, is it
> > better to another function to nohz_balance_leave_idle()?
> > Or keep their current name?
> > 
> 
> Yes that will be more appropriate name.

I've made it:

  nohz_balance_{enter,exit}_idle()

Most of the nohz stuff has the {enter,exit}.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/