lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1347529349-6704-4-git-send-email-swhiteho@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:42:29 +0100
From:	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com
Cc:	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] GFS2: Take account of blockages when using reserved blocks

The claim_reserved_blks() function was not taking account of
the possibility of "blockages" while performing allocation.
This can be caused by another node allocating something in
the same extent which has been reserved locally.

This patch tests for this condition and then skips the remainder
of the reservation in this case. This is a relatively rare event,
so that it should not affect the general performance improvement
which the block reservations provide.

The claim_reserved_blks() function also appears not to be able
to deal with reservations which cross bitmap boundaries, but
that can be dealt with in a future patch since we don't generate
boundary crossing reservations currently.

Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Reported-by: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
Cc: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
index 4d34887..c9ed814 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
@@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static void gfs2_rgrp_error(struct gfs2_rgrpd *rgd)
  * @dinode: 1 if this block is a dinode block, otherwise data block
  * @nblocks: desired extent length
  *
- * Lay claim to previously allocated block reservation blocks.
+ * Lay claim to previously reserved blocks.
  * Returns: Starting block number of the blocks claimed.
  * Sets *nblocks to the actual extent length allocated.
  */
@@ -1970,19 +1970,17 @@ static u64 claim_reserved_blks(struct gfs2_inode *ip, bool dinode,
 {
 	struct gfs2_blkreserv *rs = ip->i_res;
 	struct gfs2_rgrpd *rgd = rs->rs_rgd;
-	struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = GFS2_SB(&ip->i_inode);
 	struct gfs2_bitmap *bi;
 	u64 start_block = gfs2_rs_startblk(rs);
 	const unsigned int elen = *nblocks;
 
-	/*BUG_ON(!gfs2_glock_is_locked_by_me(ip->i_gl));*/
-	gfs2_assert_withdraw(sdp, rgd);
-	/*BUG_ON(!gfs2_glock_is_locked_by_me(rgd->rd_gl));*/
 	bi = rs->rs_bi;
 	gfs2_trans_add_bh(rgd->rd_gl, bi->bi_bh, 1);
 
 	for (*nblocks = 0; *nblocks < elen && rs->rs_free; (*nblocks)++) {
-		/* Make sure the bitmap hasn't changed */
+		if (gfs2_testbit(rgd, bi->bi_bh->b_data + bi->bi_offset,
+				 bi->bi_len, rs->rs_biblk) != GFS2_BLKST_FREE)
+			break;
 		gfs2_setbit(rgd, bi->bi_clone, bi, rs->rs_biblk,
 			    dinode ? GFS2_BLKST_DINODE : GFS2_BLKST_USED);
 		rs->rs_biblk++;
@@ -1991,20 +1989,12 @@ static u64 claim_reserved_blks(struct gfs2_inode *ip, bool dinode,
 		BUG_ON(!rgd->rd_reserved);
 		rgd->rd_reserved--;
 		dinode = false;
-		trace_gfs2_rs(ip, rs, TRACE_RS_CLAIM);
 	}
 
-	if (!rs->rs_free) {
-		struct gfs2_rgrpd *rgd = ip->i_res->rs_rgd;
-
+	trace_gfs2_rs(ip, rs, TRACE_RS_CLAIM);
+	if (!rs->rs_free || *nblocks != elen)
 		gfs2_rs_deltree(rs);
-		/* -nblocks because we haven't returned to do the math yet.
-		   I'm doing the math backwards to prevent negative numbers,
-		   but think of it as:
-		   if (unclaimed_blocks(rgd) - *nblocks >= RGRP_RSRV_MINBLKS */
-		if (unclaimed_blocks(rgd) >= RGRP_RSRV_MINBLKS + *nblocks)
-			rg_mblk_search(rgd, ip);
-	}
+
 	return start_block;
 }
 
@@ -2037,34 +2027,34 @@ int gfs2_alloc_blocks(struct gfs2_inode *ip, u64 *bn, unsigned int *nblocks,
 	if (ip->i_res->rs_requested == 0)
 		return -ECANCELED;
 
-	/* Check if we have a multi-block reservation, and if so, claim the
-	   next free block from it. */
+	/* If we have a reservation, claim blocks from it. */
 	if (gfs2_rs_active(ip->i_res)) {
 		BUG_ON(!ip->i_res->rs_free);
 		rgd = ip->i_res->rs_rgd;
 		block = claim_reserved_blks(ip, dinode, nblocks);
-	} else {
-		rgd = ip->i_rgd;
+		if (*nblocks)
+			goto found_blocks;
+	}
 
-		if (!dinode && rgrp_contains_block(rgd, ip->i_goal))
-			goal = ip->i_goal - rgd->rd_data0;
-		else
-			goal = rgd->rd_last_alloc;
-
-		blk = rgblk_search(rgd, goal, GFS2_BLKST_FREE, &bi);
-
-		/* Since all blocks are reserved in advance, this shouldn't
-		   happen */
-		if (blk == BFITNOENT) {
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "BFITNOENT, nblocks=%u\n",
-			       *nblocks);
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "FULL=%d\n",
-			       test_bit(GBF_FULL, &rgd->rd_bits->bi_flags));
-			goto rgrp_error;
-		}
+	rgd = ip->i_rgd;
 
-		block = gfs2_alloc_extent(rgd, bi, blk, dinode, nblocks);
+	if (!dinode && rgrp_contains_block(rgd, ip->i_goal))
+		goal = ip->i_goal - rgd->rd_data0;
+	else
+		goal = rgd->rd_last_alloc;
+
+	blk = rgblk_search(rgd, goal, GFS2_BLKST_FREE, &bi);
+
+	/* Since all blocks are reserved in advance, this shouldn't happen */
+	if (blk == BFITNOENT) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "BFITNOENT, nblocks=%u\n", *nblocks);
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "FULL=%d\n",
+		       test_bit(GBF_FULL, &rgd->rd_bits->bi_flags));
+		goto rgrp_error;
 	}
+
+	block = gfs2_alloc_extent(rgd, bi, blk, dinode, nblocks);
+found_blocks:
 	ndata = *nblocks;
 	if (dinode)
 		ndata--;
-- 
1.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ