[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1347532384.4539.218.camel@fourier.local.igalia.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:33:04 +0200
From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
<siglesias@...lia.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@...rogge.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
industrypack-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] staging: ipack: remove irq field in struct
ipack_device.
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 13:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:46:26AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> > From: Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@...rogge.org>
> >
> > The field irq currently is identical to the slot number. It does not seem to
> > have any real use. The number is written to hardware in ipoctal but it seems
> > the value that is written does not matter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Taprogge <jens.taprogge@...rogge.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <siglesias@...lia.com>
> > ---
> > - iowrite8(vector, ipoctal->dev->mem_space.address + 1);
> > + iowrite8(1, ipoctal->dev->mem_space.address + 1);
>
> It might be nice to put a /* dummy write */ comment here.
>
Added! Thanks for the suggestion,
Sam
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists