[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBQO2fHoidvubDiL9AhCY-FZkk5_WGyPxerT1noH41R53w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:20:09 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf: use hrtimer for event multiplexing
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 17:37 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
>> Note however that the rotation_list is still used in perf_event_task_tick()
>> to iterate over the ctx which needs unthrottling. We would have to switch
>> that loop over to a for-each-pmu() which would necessary incur more
>> iterations as it would include all the SW PMUs.
>
> Oh urgh, right. I think that was one of the reasons I bailed on the
> hrtimer thing, the frequency and throttle stuff.
>
> ctx->nr_freq and needs_unthr could help, but yeah.
I think for now, we could keep rotation list for the unthrottling.
Multiplexing won't use rotation_list anymore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists