[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7vhar29cq4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:14:27 -0700
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@...f.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Git Mailing List <git@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sound fixes for 3.6-rc6
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> writes:
>> I can't reproduce here. What is your exact request-pull invocation?
This question was not answerd. Did you ask request-pull to ask for
a branch to be pulled, or did you ask it to ask for the tag to be
pulled?
If the former, I would have say it is a pebcak. Linus asked you to
ask a signed tag to be pulled, and you want to have the tag to be
pulled, but if you do not give "git request-pull" the tag but a
branch that the tag points at, the command does not have a good
reason to countermand your (apparent) wish that the branch is what
is to be pulled.
>> Is request-pull showing a warning like:
>>
>> warn: You locally have sound-3.6 but it does not (yet)
>> warn: appear to be at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound.git
>> warn: Do you want to push it there, perhaps?
>
> Hm, it looks like the check is performed only for tag objects.
> In the example below, no warning appears:
> % git tag mytest for-next
> % git request-pull mytest~ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound.git mytest
>
> With an annotated or a signed tag, git seems giving a warning like
> above, indeed. So my test seemed wrong. Sorry for the noise.
OK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists