[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120913152717.GA4587@mwanda>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:27:17 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Bruce Humphrey <brucehum@...il.com>
Cc: abbotti@....co.uk, fmhess@...rs.sourceforge.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Staging: Comedi: dyna_pci10xx: Replace printk with
dev_info
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:46:02PM +0200, Bruce Humphrey wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments!
>
> My own answers are from the complete linux kernel newbie point of view!
> That's why I'm writing them even if they seem obvious, to make sure.
>
> > data[n] = 0;
> > > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "comedi: dyna_pci10xx: "
> > > - "timeout reading analog input\n");
> > > + dev_dbg(dev->class_dev, "timeout reading analog input\n");
> >
> > The trick with removing the "comedi: dyna_pci10xx: " prefix is that
> > you need to put this at the top of the file before the includes.
> >
> > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "comedi: dyna_pci10xx: " fmt
> >
> > You would need to remove the prefix from the other pr_info printk
> > as well so it's not included twice.
> >
>
> Thanks for the very useful info!
> This would use pr_info, and not dev_info, which I think is prefered. But of
> course, pr_info is much better than printk, coding style wise.
>
Sorry, for some reason I thought there was an existing pr_info() in
the file which would have needed to be updated. I'm not sure what
I was looking at...
Anyway, this file has changed recently in linux-next so there is
only one printk() left now.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists