[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1209131710190.23318@utopia.booyaka.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:10:51 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
To: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>
cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>, balbi@...com,
tony@...mide.com, linux@....linux.org.uk, arnd@...db.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: omap: hwmod: make *phy_48m* as the main_clk of
ocp2scp
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> In this case, the ocp2scp IP is just the *bus controller* to access the
> real USB_UTMI_PHY IP.
>
> The TRM diagram does not show that level of detail unfortunately. You
> can check the PRCM spec (Figure 78 : CD_L3_INIT_USB clock scheme) to see
> the two modules.
>
> So considering phy_48m as the main clock is still correct for the
> ocp2scp IP.
>
> The INIT_960M_FCLK will be a fck associated with the child of the
> ocp2scp nodes which is the usb_phy.
>
> Upgrading the opt_clk to fck does make sense as soon as we don't have
> any other functional clock and as soon as this clock is *mandatory*. The
> optional aspect in that case is just a wrong PRCM naming for a clock
> that is mandatory. It is similar to the DSS case that does have only
> optional clocks that are mandatory.
>
> I do agree that we must stick to the HW definition as far as we can. But
> the optional attribute is something that is wrong/inaccurate for a
> couple of IPs. HW folks agreed on that point and will fix that in the
> future.
Okay so is this an Acked-by for this patch? :-)
If so I'll take it.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists