[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120913211705.GM3388@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 23:17:05 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] thp: implement refcounting for huge zero page
Hi Kirill,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:37:58PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:16:13PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > Hi Kirill,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:07:53PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > - hpage = alloc_pages(GFP_TRANSHUGE | __GFP_ZERO, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> >
> > The page is likely as large as a pageblock so it's unlikely to create
> > much fragmentation even if the __GFP_MOVABLE is set. Said that I guess
> > it would be more correct if __GFP_MOVABLE was clear, like
> > (GFP_TRANSHUGE | __GFP_ZERO) & ~__GFP_MOVABLE because this page isn't
> > really movable (it's only reclaimable).
>
> Good point. I'll update the patchset.
>
> > The xchg vs xchgcmp locking also looks good.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
>
> Is it for the whole patchset? :)
It was meant for this one, but I reviewed the whole patchset and it
looks fine to me, so in this case it can apply to the whole patchset ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists