[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120914093945.GB2630@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:39:45 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/19] i2c-nomadik: Register sub-devices when passed
via Device Tree
> Ah, sorry. That's my fault for rushing though my ridiculously bloated post-
> vacation inbox.
:)
> > all the infos I got. Some more context would have been helpful. Is there
> > a branch somewhere with all the things collected?
>
> There will be. I'm currently just Ack collecting.
>
> In fact wait ...
>
> <3 mins pass>
>
> Now there is:
> git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git preview-for-next
OK from having a glimpse, I'd prefer to squash (or have squashed)
i2c: nomadik: Add Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver
Documentation: Device Tree binding information for i2c-nomadik driver
(Documentation should go along with the code)
i2c-nomadik: Register sub-devices when passed via Device Tree
into one patch and take that via the I2C tree. This will allow me to
resolve the merge conflict in my tree on my own. I don't see a strong
reason to have those go via arm-soc (like prevented build-failures or
easier merges), if I missed such a reason, please let me know.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists