linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:12:49 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>, balbi@...com,
	arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, richard.zhao@...escale.com,
	B29397@...escale.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
	marex@...x.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 02:28:19PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 01:58 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > The PHY framework provides a set of API's for the PHY drivers to
> > create/remove a PHY and the PHY users to obtain a reference to the PHY
> > using or without using phandle. If the PHY users has to obtain a reference to
> > the PHY without using phandle, the platform specfic intialization code (say
> > from board file) should have already called phy_bind with the binding
> > information. The binding information consists of phy's device name, phy
> > user device name and an index. The index is used when the same phy user
> > binds to mulitple phys.
> > 
> > PHY drivers should create the PHY by passing phy_descriptor that has
> > information about the PHY and ops like init, exit, suspend, resume,
> > poweron, shutdown.
> 
> Some comments inside.
> 
> While looking over the code, I was thinking why not abstract the phy
> with a "bus" in the linux kernel. The ethernet phys are on the mdio_bus,
> see /sys/bus/mdio_bus. This saves you hand crafting devices, drivers and
> bindings,

I don't think that's a good idea, actually. You can have USB PHYs which
are memory mapped, or connected through i2c, or connected through any
other bus. If the PHYs layer itself is a bus, it means we will need to
register a device on two different buses, which doesn't sound very
nice IMHO.

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)