linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 19/24] xen/arm: compile blkfront and blkback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120914131242.GN25249@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:12:42 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:	arnd@...db.de, linux@....linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	tim@....org, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/24] xen/arm: compile blkfront and blkback

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:13:21PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>

So this should go through Jen's tree or at least get his Ack.
But doing all of these patches seperatly is painfull - and remembering
where they go is a bit of logistical nightmare.

Jen, are you OK with this patch?
> ---
>  drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c  |    1 +
>  include/xen/interface/io/protocols.h |    3 +++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
> index 73f196c..63dd5b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>  
>  #include <xen/events.h>
>  #include <xen/page.h>
> +#include <xen/xen.h>
>  #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
>  #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
>  #include "common.h"
> diff --git a/include/xen/interface/io/protocols.h b/include/xen/interface/io/protocols.h
> index 01fc8ae..0eafaf2 100644
> --- a/include/xen/interface/io/protocols.h
> +++ b/include/xen/interface/io/protocols.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  #define XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_X86_64     "x86_64-abi"
>  #define XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_IA64       "ia64-abi"
>  #define XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_POWERPC64  "powerpc64-abi"
> +#define XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_ARM        "arm-abi"
>  
>  #if defined(__i386__)
>  # define XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_NATIVE XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_X86_32
> @@ -14,6 +15,8 @@
>  # define XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_NATIVE XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_IA64
>  #elif defined(__powerpc64__)
>  # define XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_NATIVE XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_POWERPC64
> +#elif defined(__arm__)
> +# define XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_NATIVE XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_ARM
>  #else
>  # error arch fixup needed here
>  #endif
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/