[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1209141508130.29232@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:13:38 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@....org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/24] xen: clear IRQ_NOAUTOEN and IRQ_NOREQUEST
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 14/09/12 12:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Reset the IRQ_NOAUTOEN and IRQ_NOREQUEST flags that are enabled by
> > default on ARM. If IRQ_NOAUTOEN is set, __setup_irq doesn't call
> > irq_startup, that is responsible for calling irq_unmask at startup time.
> > As a result event channels remain masked.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> > Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/xen/events.c | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > index 5ecb596..8ffb7b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > @@ -836,6 +836,7 @@ int bind_evtchn_to_irq(unsigned int evtchn)
> > struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
> > WARN_ON(info == NULL || info->type != IRQT_EVTCHN);
> > }
> > + irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOREQUEST|IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
>
> This one just sent a shiver down my spine. Are you doing this for a PPI?
Not really: even though there is just one source of event notifications
(that is a PPI), we have many event channels. When a domain receives a
notification (via the PPI), it checks on a bitmask to which event channel
it corresponds. From the Linux point of view every event channel is a
Linux irq belonging to the xen_dynamic_chip (see
drivers/xen/events.c:xen_dynamic_chip).
So here I am not doing this for the one PPI, but I am doing this for
every Linux irq (of chip xen_dynamic_chip) that represents an event
channel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists