[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F19D40E81@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:24:32 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, qiuxishi <qiuxishi@...il.com>
CC: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
"qiuxishi@...wei.com" <qiuxishi@...wei.com>,
"bessel.wang@...wei.com" <bessel.wang@...wei.com>,
"wujianguo@...wei.com" <wujianguo@...wei.com>,
"paul.gortmaker@...driver.com" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
"kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] memory hotplug: fix a double register section
info bug
> This is an unusual configuration but it's not unheard of. PPC64 in rare
> (and usually broken) configurations can have one node span another. Tony
> should know if such a configuration is normally allowed on Itanium or if
> this should be considered a platform bug. Tony?
We definitely have platforms where the physical memory on node 0
that we skipped to leave physical address space for PCI mem mapped
devices gets tagged back at the very top of memory, after other nodes.
E.g. A 2-node system with 8G on each might look like this:
0-2G RAM on node 0
2G-4G PCI map space
4G-8G RAM on node 0
8G-16GRAM on node 1
16G-18G RAM on node 0
Is this the situation that we are talking about? Or something different?
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists