[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120914171554.GA29639@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:15:54 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] uprobes: Do not setup ->active_uprobe/state prematurely
handle_swbp() sets utask->active_uprobe before handler_chain(),
and UTASK_SSTEP before pre_ssout(). This complicates the code
for no reason, arch_ hooks or consumer->handler() should not
(and can't) use this info.
Change handle_swbp() to initialize them after pre_ssout(), and
remove the no longer needed cleanup-utask code.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 9 +++------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 760acc1..9893cba 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1496,22 +1496,19 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (!utask)
goto cleanup_ret;
}
- utask->active_uprobe = uprobe;
+
handler_chain(uprobe, regs);
if (uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP && can_skip_sstep(uprobe, regs))
goto cleanup_ret;
- utask->state = UTASK_SSTEP;
if (!pre_ssout(uprobe, regs, bp_vaddr)) {
arch_uprobe_enable_step(&uprobe->arch);
+ utask->active_uprobe = uprobe;
+ utask->state = UTASK_SSTEP;
return;
}
cleanup_ret:
- if (utask) {
- utask->active_uprobe = NULL;
- utask->state = UTASK_RUNNING;
- }
if (!(uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP))
/*
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists