[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120914171600.GA29649@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:16:00 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] uprobes: Kill UTASK_BP_HIT state
Kill UTASK_BP_HIT state, it buys nothing but complicates the code.
It is only used in uprobe_notify_resume() to decide who should be
called, we can check utask->active_uprobe != NULL instead. And this
allows us to simplify handle_swbp(), no need to clear utask->state.
Likewise we could kill UTASK_SSTEP, but UTASK_BP_HIT is worse and
imho should die. The problem is, it creates the special case when
task->utask is NULL, we can't distinguish RUNNING and BP_HIT. With
his patch utask == NULL always means RUNNING.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
include/linux/uprobes.h | 1 -
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 29 +++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index e6f0331..18d839d 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ struct uprobe_consumer {
#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
enum uprobe_task_state {
UTASK_RUNNING,
- UTASK_BP_HIT,
UTASK_SSTEP,
UTASK_SSTEP_ACK,
UTASK_SSTEP_TRAPPED,
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 403d2e0..4ea0f0b 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1469,10 +1469,6 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
bp_vaddr = uprobe_get_swbp_addr(regs);
uprobe = find_active_uprobe(bp_vaddr, &is_swbp);
- utask = current->utask;
- if (utask)
- utask->state = UTASK_RUNNING;
-
if (!uprobe) {
if (is_swbp > 0) {
/* No matching uprobe; signal SIGTRAP. */
@@ -1491,6 +1487,7 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
return;
}
+ utask = current->utask;
if (!utask) {
utask = add_utask();
/* Cannot allocate; re-execute the instruction. */
@@ -1547,13 +1544,12 @@ static void handle_singlestep(struct uprobe_task *utask, struct pt_regs *regs)
}
/*
- * On breakpoint hit, breakpoint notifier sets the TIF_UPROBE flag. (and on
- * subsequent probe hits on the thread sets the state to UTASK_BP_HIT) and
- * allows the thread to return from interrupt.
+ * On breakpoint hit, breakpoint notifier sets the TIF_UPROBE flag and
+ * allows the thread to return from interrupt. After that handle_swbp()
+ * sets utask->active_uprobe.
*
- * On singlestep exception, singlestep notifier sets the TIF_UPROBE flag and
- * also sets the state to UTASK_SSTEP_ACK and allows the thread to return from
- * interrupt.
+ * On singlestep exception, singlestep notifier sets the TIF_UPROBE flag
+ * and allows the thread to return from interrupt.
*
* While returning to userspace, thread notices the TIF_UPROBE flag and calls
* uprobe_notify_resume().
@@ -1563,10 +1559,10 @@ void uprobe_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs)
struct uprobe_task *utask;
utask = current->utask;
- if (!utask || utask->state == UTASK_BP_HIT)
- handle_swbp(regs);
- else
+ if (utask && utask->active_uprobe)
handle_singlestep(utask, regs);
+ else
+ handle_swbp(regs);
}
/*
@@ -1575,17 +1571,10 @@ void uprobe_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs)
*/
int uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- struct uprobe_task *utask;
-
if (!current->mm || !test_bit(MMF_HAS_UPROBES, ¤t->mm->flags))
return 0;
- utask = current->utask;
- if (utask)
- utask->state = UTASK_BP_HIT;
-
set_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
-
return 1;
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists