[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <505374E2.5080308@mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 22:18:10 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: arnd@...db.de, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, catalin.marinas@....com, tim@....org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/24] xen/arm: introduce CONFIG_XEN on ARM
Hello.
On 09/14/2012 03:13 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Changes in v2:
> - mark Xen guest support on ARM as EXPERIMENTAL.
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 2f88d8d..e92518d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -1897,6 +1897,16 @@ config DEPRECATED_PARAM_STRUCT
> This was deprecated in 2001 and announced to live on for 5 years.
> Some old boot loaders still use this way.
>
> +config XEN_DOM0
> + def_bool y
> +
> +config XEN
> + bool "Xen guest support on ARM (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> + depends on EXPERIMENTAL && ARM && OF
> + select XEN_DOM0
What's the point of selecting it if it's always "y"?
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists