[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A874F61F95741C4A9BA573A70FE3998F41EF4C03@DQHE02.ent.ti.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:33:36 +0000
From: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@...com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] iio: adc: add new lp8788 adc driver
>
> Couple of nitpicks in line to add to Lars-Peter's ones.
I really appreciate it.
> > +#define LP8788_CHAN(_id, _type) { \
> > + .type = _type, \
> > + .indexed = 1, \
> > + .channel = LPADC_##_id, \
> > + .info_mask = IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW_SEPARATE_BIT | \
> > + IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE_SEPARATE_BIT, \
> > + .address = LP8788_ADC_RAW, \
> > + .scan_type = IIO_ST('u', 12, 16, 0), \
> > + .scan_index = 1, \
> scan_type and scan_index should only be relevant if you are doing
> buffered capture (unless I'm missing another use of them in here
> somewhere...) Hence drop them for now...
Thanks for clarifying this.
> > +static void lp8788_iio_map_unregister(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > + struct lp8788_adc *adc)
> > +{
> Can't immediately see how this runs without adc->map set. If it
> doesn't drop the check.
> > + if (adc->map)
> > + iio_map_array_unregister(indio_dev, adc->map);
> > +}
You're right. No need to check whether iio_map is valid or not.
That is already implemented in the iio_map_array_unregister().
It will be removed in the next patch.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Milo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists