linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] ACPI/pci-bind: remove bind/unbind callbacks from acpi_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE9FiQWk_2gPyVUiLgvRQ=qrFNby_R7Qh-QNruobQnhVFTn21w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:27:22 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] ACPI/pci-bind: remove bind/unbind callbacks from acpi_device_ops

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com> wrote:
>  From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
>
> Now ACPI devices are created before/destroyed after corresponding PCI
> devices, and acpi_platform_notify/acpi_platform_notify_remove will
> update PCI<->ACPI binding relationship when creating/destroying PCI
> devices, there's no need to invoke bind/unbind callbacks from ACPI
> device probe/destroy routines anymore. So remove bind/unbind callbacks
> from acpi_device_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c     |  100 +++++++++----------------------------------
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c     |    9 ----
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c         |   21 +--------
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h     |    4 --
>  include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h |    1 -
>  5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index d1ecca2..f31cb2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1232,17 +1232,8 @@ static int acpi_bus_remove(struct acpi_device *dev, int rmdevice)
>         dev->removal_type = ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_EJECT;
>         device_release_driver(&dev->dev);
>
> -       if (!rmdevice)
> -               return 0;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * unbind _ADR-Based Devices when hot removal
> -        */
> -       if (dev->flags.bus_address) {
> -               if ((dev->parent) && (dev->parent->ops.unbind))
> -                       dev->parent->ops.unbind(dev);
> -       }
> -       acpi_device_unregister(dev, ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_EJECT);
> +       if (rmdevice)
> +               acpi_device_unregister(dev, ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_EJECT);
>
>         return 0;
>  }

for pci root bus, acpi_bus_trim() is used to remove acpi_device.

and later in acpi_pci_root_remove to stop pci drivers/ioapic driver,
iommu driver then remove pci devices.

if call back is removed there, then could some functions in
acpi_pci_unbind() will be skipped.

I really do not want to add pci_stop_bus_devices() in
pci_root_hp.c::handle_root_bridge_removal before
calling acpi_bus_trim...

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/