linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] applesmc: Bump max wait and rearrange udelay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 15 Sep 2012 19:38:00 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
To:	Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rydberg@...omail.se,
	khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] applesmc: Bump max wait and rearrange udelay



On Sat, 15 Sep 2012, Parag Warudkar wrote:

> 
> Yeah, that would fix the code to match what it says and eliminate most 
> failures. But in my testing sometimes it needed a max wait of 57344 us - 
> I wrote a separate patch to instrument it by bumping up max wait in 
> increments of 0x2000 until it no longer failed under my normal workloads. 

Of course I meant 57 us instead of 57344 which I remembered from my 
unconverted debug printks.

Parag
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/