[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120915.000059.636218745264773259.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:00:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: linux@....linux.org.uk
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, will.deacon@....com, nico@...aro.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/24] net: seeq: use __iomem pointers for MMIO
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:56:07 +0100
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
>> so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
>
> Same comment as for eesox. const void __iomem * is not a problem on
> x86, so it should not be a problem on ARM.
Agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists