[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1347696825-24622-6-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:13:38 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] workqueue: use __cpuinit instead of __devinit for cpu callback
It makes less sense to use __devinit(the memory will be discard
after boot when !HOTPLUG).
It will be more accurate to to use __cpuinit(the memory will be discard
after boot when !HOTPLUG_CPU).
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 5438c0d..e8d3c95 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3532,7 +3532,7 @@ static void gcwq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
* Workqueues should be brought up before normal priority CPU notifiers.
* This will be registered high priority CPU notifier.
*/
-static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
+static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action,
void *hcpu)
{
@@ -3573,7 +3573,7 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
* Workqueues should be brought down after normal priority CPU notifiers.
* This will be registered as low priority CPU notifier.
*/
-static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_down_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
+static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_down_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action,
void *hcpu)
{
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists