linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] Deferred probing in driver model is racy, resulting in lost probes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVXFVOZ=4HFAy38q_8ZUjOPffcv_mMTi7KCdh3HcX=MCLw5SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 16 Sep 2012 21:24:43 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Deferred probing in driver model is racy, resulting in lost probes

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> It isn't.  As I said, it's a race condition due to lack of locking - the
> driver hasn't been added to the list of drivers at this point:
>
> int bus_add_driver(struct device_driver *drv)
> {
> ...
>         if (drv->bus->p->drivers_autoprobe) {
>                 error = driver_attach(drv);
>                 if (error)
>                         goto out_unregister;
>         }
>         klist_add_tail(&priv->knode_bus, &bus->p->klist_drivers);
> ...
> }
>
> Notice that the attaching is done _before_ the driver is added to the
> bus driver list.

Yes, it is a problem since a new device may be added to bus
and bus_probe_device() may not see the new added driver.

So looks klist_add_tail() should complete before driver_attach()
inside bus_add_driver().

The attached one line change should fix the problem because the
below way can guarantee that no probe(dev) may be lost.


CPU0				CPU1
driver_register
	...
	write(bus->driver_list)
	smp_mb()
	read(bus->device_list)
	...
				device_add
					/* bus_add_device */	
					write(bus->device_list)
					smp_mb()
					/* bus_probe_device*/
					read(bus->driver_list)

And the smp_mb() has been implicit by UNLOCK+LOCK
of 'klist' according to 'VARIETIES OF MEMORY BARRIER' part
of Documentation/memory-barriers.txt.

Could you test the below patch to see if it can fix your problem?

diff --git a/drivers/base/bus.c b/drivers/base/bus.c
index 181ed26..17d7437 100644
--- a/drivers/base/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/base/bus.c
@@ -714,12 +714,12 @@ int bus_add_driver(struct device_driver *drv)
 	if (error)
 		goto out_unregister;

+	klist_add_tail(&priv->knode_bus, &bus->p->klist_drivers);
 	if (drv->bus->p->drivers_autoprobe) {
 		error = driver_attach(drv);
 		if (error)
 			goto out_unregister;
 	}
-	klist_add_tail(&priv->knode_bus, &bus->p->klist_drivers);
 	module_add_driver(drv->owner, drv);

 	error = driver_create_file(drv, &driver_attr_uevent);



Thanks,
-- 
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/